As more ladies become minds of state, will the world actually change?

Christian Hartmann / Reuters

Margot Wallstrom took workplace as Sweden’s international minister in 2014, declaring she’d pursue a “feminist international policy.” She’s now held the post for 2 years, and it’s nevertheless perhaps not completely clear exactly just just what she intended. Although it’s true that the whole college of feminist international-relations theory is rolling out considering that the 1980s, the field remains contested, and mainly untested when you look at the world of policy. You might surmise from Wallstrom’s term, it say, for example, about the logic of preventive war as she herself stated, that a “feminist foreign policy” would promote women’s rights around the world, but what would? Would it not focus on trade that is free available boundaries, or stress protecting workers from competition? Would it not create an alternative way of coping with unsecured material that is nuclear the previous Soviet Union?

Awarded, Wallstrom have not had enough time to implement the theory; in accordance with longstanding foreign-policy traditions like realism, feminist international policy hasn’t yet had the opportunity to keep most of a history. Read more